THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION AND INFORMATION
Pesquisas Acadêmicas: THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION AND INFORMATION. Pesquise 862.000+ trabalhos acadêmicosPor: vrhermann • 3/11/2014 • 5.133 Palavras (21 Páginas) • 478 Visualizações
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of whether investment in information and communication
technology (ICT), combined with organizational changes and worker skills contribute to
better performance in Canadian firms. We find that Canadian firms have actively
engaged in organizational changes in the areas of production and efficiency practices,
human resource management (HRM) practices, and product/service quality-related
practices. These practices along with ICT use are found to be related to better firm
performance. We find that while ICT is productive on its own, it is more productive in
firms that combine high levels of ICT with high levels of organizational change. The
firms that combine ICT with organizational changes have a high incidence of
productivity improvement and have high rates of innovation. These findings seem to
suggest that to be successful, firms typically need to adopt ICT as part of a “system” or
“cluster” of mutually-reinforcing organizational approaches. We also find that ICT and
human capital are complements in the service sectors. The firms that combine high levels
of ICT and high levels of worker skills have better firm performance.
JEL No. J24, L20, O30
Key Words. Information Technology, Innovation, Organizational Change, Productivity
2
“ Information technology is best described not as a traditional capital investment, but as a
“general purpose technology” (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995). In most cases, the
economic contributions of general purpose technologies are substantially larger than
would be predicted by simply multiplying the quantity of capital investment devoted to
them by a normal rate of return. Instead, such technologies are economically beneficial
mostly because they facilitate complementary innovations”.
(Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000, p. 24)
1 Introduction
Do computers contribute to productivity growth? Most of the aggregate-level evidence
shows that investment in information and communications technology (ICT) is making
an important contribution to economic growth and labour productivity growth across
OECD countries (OECD, 2000; Oliner and Sichel, 2000; Council of Economic Advisors,
2000; Jorgenson and Stiroh, 2000). These studies found that technological progress,
particularly the rapid advances in semiconductor technology, and capital deepening are
the primary factors behind the acceleration in the U.S. growth in recent years (Jorgenson
and Stiroh, 2000).1
Harchaoui et al. (2002) describe the similarities between Canada and the United
States in the late 1990s. Like the United States, Canada experienced dramatic increases in
both GDP growth and multifactor productivity growth in the period post 1995. As in the
United States, ICT growth was the largest contributor to the growth in capital services in
Canada. Subsequent studies confirm that Canada shows trends similar to those in the
United States, but in somewhat attenuated form. (Harchaoui et al., 2003; Rao,et al.; 2003;
Gu and Wang, 2003).
Over the last decade, there are many firm-level studies in the US examining the
relationship between ICT investment and firm performance. The evidence is mixed2.
Studies using the 1980s data found no evidence that computers contributed positively to
output growth (see, for example, Loveman, 1994; and Barua et.al., 1995). In contrast,
studies such as Brynjolfsson and Hitt (1995, 1996) and Lichtenberg (1995) employing
more recent data over the 1988-1992 period have found positive relationship between
ICT investment and labour productivity.
A recent study by Brynjolfsson and Hitt (1997) explores the relationship between
computers and productivity growth. The study uses data that included more than 600
large US firms over the period 1987 to 1994. The findings show that computers make a
positive contribution to output growth. More interestingly, the study concludes that, “as a
1 Gordon (2000), among others, has argued that while there has been tremendous productivity growth in
ICT-producing industries, there is only limited evidence of any incremental productivity growth in ICTusing
industries.
2 For a comprehensive literature review of firm-level studies, see Brynjolfsson and Hitt (2000).
3
general purpose technology, the pattern of growth contribution appears to suggest that
computers are a part of a larger system of technological and organizational changes that
increased productivity over time”.
Many studies have focused on the services sector firms and examined the
relationship between ICT and firm performance (for a review of the literature, see
Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2000). While the evidence from these studies seems to be mixed,
Brynjolfsson and Hitt (1995)
...