A REVIEW OF THE ARSENIC CYCLE
Casos: A REVIEW OF THE ARSENIC CYCLE. Pesquise 862.000+ trabalhos acadêmicosPor: viniciusdez • 10/5/2014 • 13.490 Palavras (54 Páginas) • 484 Visualizações
Water Research Pergamon Press 1972. Vol. 6, pp. 1259-1274. Printed in Great Britain
A REVIEW OF THE ARSENIC CYCLE IN
NATURAL WATERS*
JOHN F. FERGUSON and JEROME GAV1S
Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
(Received 16 November 1971)
Ahstract--A review of the occurrence and cycling of arsenic in fresh waters is presented. The
fate of arsenic in natural waters has received little attention in past years, in spite of the fact
that arsenic is toxic and probably carcinogenic through exposure by drinking water.
The chemistry of arsenic in aqueous systems is reviewed. Thermodynamic information is
summarized in an Eh-pH diagram for a system including sulfur. Mechanisms for removal of
arsenic from the solution phase to the sediments are discussed. The possible microbially-
mediated reactions of arsenic, including oxidation of arsenite, methylation of arsenic species,
and reduction of arsenate, are discussed with reference to the locale of the reaction in the
water column or in the sediments and to the toxicological significance of the reaction products
and the rates of reaction.
A cycle of reactions for arsenic in a stratified lake is proposed and evidence is summarized
relating to the occurrence and importance of particular reactions.
The potential pollutional hazard of arsenic is from ingestion of drinking water with high
concentrations of arsenic, rather than consuming arsenic containing aquatic organisms.
Although arsenic is greatly concentrated in aquatic organisms, it is evidently not progressively
concentrated along a food chain. In addition, arsenic when consumed as an organically-bound
species in flesh evidently has low toxicity.
The global cycle of arsenic is discussed. While volcanic activity is the original source of much
of the arsenic in sedimentary rocks, in recent times weathering of arsenic has been approxi-
mately in balance with deposition of arsenic in sediments. Human activities, including the use
of arsenic, the burning of fossil fuels, increased erosion of land and the mining and processing
of sulfide minerals, have increased the amount of arsenic entering the oceans by at least a factor
of 3. This increase will have no effect on the concentration in the oceans for many hundreds of
years.
However, these cultural contributions are the source of high localized concentrations in many
fresh waters. Careful surveillance and increased knowledge of the fate or arsenic in the aquatic
environment are needed to insure that there will be no public health hazard.
THE DISCOVERY that mercury is readily cycled from the sediments to solution and
concentrated by organisms through the food chain has led to speculation that similar
cycles may occur with other trace elements. Much of this speculation has centered on
arsenic. Arsenic, like mercury, has been widely used and misused for its toxic proper-
ties, and large accumulations due to human activities now exists in soils and sediments.
This paper is intended as a companion to the previous paper (GAvIS and FERGUSON,
1972) that discussed the cycle of mercury in natural water systems. The same considera-
tions apply. The same approach will be used. But the central question, whether arsenic
pollution is an important threat to aquatic organisms or human health, must be
examined in a slightly different way. Although there have been instances of arsenical
poisoning to humans through water ingestion, there are no current examples of toxic
accumulations in food organisms.
Arsenic has a long history of use for its toxic and medicinal properties. Arsenical
compounds were used in medicine 2000-3000 yr ago in the Orient. Therapeutic
applications have continued through the ages. Arsenic also gained the reputation of a
* Presented at the XV General Assembly of the IUGG, Moscow, U.S.S.R., August, 1971.
WATER 6[ 11--n 1259
1260 JOHN F. FERGUSON and JEROME GAVIS
dangerous poison in the Middle Ages, and until the nineteenth century was the
preferred poison of most homocidal practitioners. In the nineteenth century, the
therapeutic use of arsenicals against trypanosomal or spirochaetal organisms became
classical examples of chemotherapy. These demonstrated the widely differing toxicity
and effectiveness of arsenic in different oxidation states and combined with different
organic ligands.
In
...