CARTES ESTRATÉGICOS
Relatório de pesquisa: CARTES ESTRATÉGICOS. Pesquise 862.000+ trabalhos acadêmicosPor: mpanfilo • 23/12/2014 • Relatório de pesquisa • 1.254 Palavras (6 Páginas) • 230 Visualizações
MAPAS ESTRATÉGICOS
What are they?
A strategy map, often referred to as a perceptual map in marketing, is a tool for visually displaying
the position of a company or a line of business relative to competitors. Strategy maps generally place
firms based on two or three dimensions that capture either critical elements driving consumer
preferences or important attributes characterizing competition.
When do we use them?
Strategy maps find wide use in strategic analyses. They may be used as part of a broader competi-tor or industry analysis. In marketing, strategy maps are frequently used to highlight differences
in consumers’ perceptions across various product lines. Strategy maps are particularly useful for
understanding and illustrating a company’s competitive position relative to rivals and may be used
to identify the generic strategies of firms (e.g., whether a firm is a low-cost competitor, a differenti-ated player, or a niche player within an industry).
Why do we use them?
Strategy maps are useful visual tools to quickly communi-cate a large amount of information on a collection of firms.
They are a flexible tool that are fairly easy to generate and
that appear in a number of different formats and for a num-ber of different uses. One of the primary uses in a strategic
analysis is to identify the “generic strategies” of firms (see
matrix to the right). Arguably, there are four main ways
a firm can position itself within a market, defined by the
source of competitive advantage a firm pursues and the
firm’s competitive scope within an industry.
COMPETITIVE SCOPE
WITHIN INDUSTRY
Broad
Cost
Leadership
Differen-tiation
Narrow
Focused
Low Cost
Niche
Cost Uniqueness
SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE
TH E STR ATEG I ST ’ S TO O LK IT
50
Broadly speaking, there are two types of competitive advantage a firm may pursue: low cost or
uniqueness. A low-cost strategy is one in which the firm simply tries to have lower costs than
the marginal producer in the industry. The marginal producer is that firm that is just viable in
the marketplace—generating revenues at roughly its opportunity cost. A uniqueness strategy is
one in which a firm tries to command a higher willingness to pay (i.e., prices, from customers). A
uniqueness strategy usually entails offering products of higher quality or with more features than
other products in the marketplace.
Firms may choose to target a broader or narrower segment of the market. Most markets can be
segmented into smaller product markets defined by geography, buyer characteristics (e.g., age,
race, income, and gender), and other product line characteristics. Broad-scope firms tend to deliver
products and services that appeal to a wide number of these segments. They may do so by offering
individual products and services with broad appeal or by offering a portfolio of products that cover
the product space. For example, Henry Ford’s Model T automobile was built with a broad target
market in mind: people who wanted a simple, affordable car. Alternatively, General Mills offers a
broad array of cereals to try to appeal to each market segment. Both are examples of broad-scope
strategies. On the opposite end of the spectrum are narrow strategies that target one or a few market
segments. Porsche manufactures and sells high-end sports cars to a narrow segment of affluent
automobile owners. Nature’s Path Organic sells healthy cereals to a narrower environmentally and
socially conscious consumer base.
These two dimensions, broad versus narrow and low cost versus unique, define four generic strategies:
1. Broad-scope, low-cost players are referred to as cost leaders. Wal-Mart is a classic example of
a company trying to appeal to a wide audience with the lowest-cost products. Others include
Dell Computers, McDonald’s Restaurants, and Nucor Steel. Cost leaders typically engage in
aggressive cost-cutting, build market share to gain economies of scale, use low-cost inputs
and labor, minimize overhead such as R&D, and invest in low-cost state-of-the-art opera-tions and continuous improvement initiatives.
2. Broad-scope, unique players are referred to as differentiated players. The Target Corporation
is illustrative of this strategy. A mass-market retailer, it offers higher-quality products in a
more refined setting (and at higher prices) than Wal-Mart does. Other examples include
Apple, Intel, and Goldman Sachs. Differentiators often invest heavily in advertising to build
brand awareness, develop innovative capabilities so as to stay on the cutting edge, and invest
heavily
...